Correspondence analysis of multidimensional poverty in the districts of the province of santa, 2017
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research work was to evaluate multidimensional poverty in the Province of Santa with the information from the 2017 National Household Survey, for which one of our 477 records was selected. Multidimensional poverty was assessed using the unsatisfied basic needs method: not poor (has all basic needs), regularly poor (at least does not have one basic need), poor (at least does not have two or three basic needs), extreme poverty (lives in difficult scenarios), being used as a cutoff point for the multidimensional poverty index> 5.446. Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) and Spearman's correlation were applied. 1.7 % were non-poor; 85.5 %, regularly poor; 12.4 % poor and 0.4 % in extreme poverty. There was no correlation between the education and health dimensions of the families, nor between the education and infrastructure well-being dimensions of the families in the province of Santa. There was a moderate correlation between dimensions education and wellbeing of services 0.567. The multidimensional poverty index was 5,446, classifying households as poor.
Article Details
References
Barr, N. (2005). Economics of the Walfare State. Oxford: 2012.
Boltvinik, J. (2013). Medición multidimensional de pobreza. América Latina de precursora a rezagada. Sociedad y Equidad, 4-29.
Castañeda, C. P. (2018). Perú es sexto en la Región en la Pobreza Multidimensional. La Cámara, 6-8.
Urbina, M. R. (2017). La pobreza monetaria desde la perspectiva de la pobreza multidimensional: el caso peruano. Enfoque n.os, 77 - 98.
Peña, L. A. (2015). Un indicador de pobreza multidimensional alternativo para venezuela. Innovaciencia, 29 - 40.
Benvin, E. R. (2016). Propuesta de un indicador de bienestar multidimensional de uso del tiempo y condiciones de vida aplicado a Colombia, el Ecuador, México y el Uruguay. Revista CEPAL 118, 122 - 145.
Foster, S. A. (2008). Recuento y medición multidimensional de la pobreza. OPHI WORKING PAPER SERIES.
Kaztman, R. (1989). La heterogeneidad de la pobreza. El caso de Montevideo. Revista de la Cepal, 142-152.
López, E. (2005). Problemas sociales desigualdad pobreza y exclusion social. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Díaz, M. A. (2012). Análisis Estadístico de Datos Multivariados. Bogotá D. C., Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá.
ONU. (1995). Cumbre Mundial, sobre desarrollo social. Implementación y seguimiento de los acuerdos de la Cumbre Social Post - Ginebra, 1-18.
Peña, E. A. (2015). Un indicador de Pobreza multidimensional alternativo para Venezuela. Innovaciencia, 52 - 74.
Pinzón, R. C. (2011). Ïndice de pobreza Multidimensional para Colombia. ARCHIVOS DE ECONOMÍA.
Pinzón, R. C. (2011). Índice de Pobreza Multidimensional para Colombia (IPM-Colombia) 1997-2010. Archivos de Economía.
Sen, A. (1979). Issues in the Measurement of Poverty. Journal of Economics, 286 - 307.